4.7 Article

Extra-pair mating in a passerine bird with highly duplicated major histocompatibility complex class II: Preference for the golden mean

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 28, 期 23, 页码 5133-5144

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15273

关键词

bluethroat; compatibility; extra-pair mating; major histocompatibility complex; mate choice; optimal MHC

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [107585/V40, 146984/432]
  2. Nansen Endowment [147/98]
  3. Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) are essential in vertebrate adaptive immunity, and they are highly diverse and duplicated in many lineages. While it is widely established that pathogen-mediated selection maintains MHC diversity through balancing selection, the role of mate choice in shaping MHC diversity is debated. Here, we investigate female mating preferences for MHC class II (MHCII) in the bluethroat (Luscinia svecica), a passerine bird with high levels of extra-pair paternity and extremely duplicated MHCII. We genotyped family samples with mixed brood paternity and categorized their MHCII alleles according to their functional properties in peptide binding. Our results strongly indicate that females select extra-pair males in a nonrandom, self-matching manner that provides offspring with an allelic repertoire size closer to the population mean, as compared to offspring sired by the social male. This is consistent with a compatible genes model for extra-pair mate choice where the optimal allelic diversity is intermediate, not maximal. This golden mean presumably reflects a trade-off between maximizing pathogen recognition benefits and minimizing autoimmunity costs. Our study exemplifies how mate choice can reduce the population variance in individual MHC diversity and exert strong stabilizing selection on the trait. It also supports the hypothesis that extra-pair mating is adaptive through altered genetic constitution in offspring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据