4.5 Article

Effect of Lung Surfactant Protein SP-C and SP-C-Promoted Membrane Fragmentation on Cholesterol Dynamics

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 111, 期 8, 页码 1703-1713

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy [BIO2012-30733, BIO2015-67930-R]
  2. Regional Government of Madrid [S2013/M1T-2807]
  3. Academy of Finland
  4. Magnus Ehmrooth Foundation
  5. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  6. Ramon Cajal
  7. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport
  8. European Molecular Biology Organization [ASTF241-2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To allow breathing and prevent alveolar collapse, lung surfactant (LS) develops a complex membranous system at the respiratory surface. LS is defined by a specific protein and lipid composition, including saturated and unsaturated phospholipid species and cholesterol. Surfactant protein C (SP-C) has been suggested to be an essential element for sustaining the presence of cholesterol in surfactant without functional impairment. In this work, we used a fluorescent sterol-partitioning assay to assess the effect of the surfactant proteins SP-B and SP-C on cholesterol distribution in membranes. Our results suggest that in the LS context, the combined action of SP-B and SP-C appears to facilitate cholesterol dynamics, whereas SP-C does not seem to establish a direct interaction with cholesterol that could increase the partition of free cholesterol into membranes. Interestingly, SP-C exhibits a membrane-fragmentation behavior, leading to the conversion of large unilamellar vesicles into highly curved vesicles similar to 25 nm in diameter. Sterol partition was observed to be sensitive to the bending of bilayers, indicating that the effect of SP-C to mobilize cholesterol could be indirectly associated with SP-C-mediated membrane remodeling. Our results suggest a potential role for SP-C in generating small surfactant structures that may participate in cholesterol mobilization and pulmonary surfactant homeostasis at the alveolar interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据