4.4 Article

Identification of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli by a new multiplex PCR assay and capillary electrophoresis

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2019.101477

关键词

Multiplex PCR; Temperature switch PCR; Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli; Pathotype

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Peoples Republic of China [2018ZX10712001-014]
  2. Pathogen Monitoring Capacity Building Project [131031102000150003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) is a set of the most common pathogens causing diarrhea. DEC strains are classified into five pathotypes based on the possession of different virulence genes: enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) or Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC). The development of an easy-to-use method to detect the specific virulence genes and distinguish the pathotypes is essential for the diagnosis and surveillance of DEC infections. In this study, a multiplex PCR assay (mPCR) specific to nine virulence genes and an internal control was designed for the identification of five DEC pathotypes. A temperature switch PCR (TSP) strategy was used in the PCR amplification. The PCR products were detected by capillary electrophoresis. The limit of detection (LOD) of the 10-plex reaction was 5 x 10(3) copies/reaction for stx2 and 5 x 10(2) copies/reaction for the other targets. The mPCR showed very high specificity, and inclusivity and exclusivity were both 100%. When the mPCR assay was used for the detection of 221 cryopreserved diarrhea specimens, DEC colonies were detected from 49 specimens, and the positive rate was 22.2%. The mPCR assay was sensitive and specific, and the amplified product could be analyzed easily. Thus, this method could be used effectively to identify the suspected colonies of DEC in the primary culture of the specimen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据