4.4 Article

Extension of the visco-plastic self-consistent model to account for elasto-visco-plastic behavior using a perturbed visco-plastic approach

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-651X/ab4b66

关键词

elasto-visco-plasticity; crystal plasticity; self-consistent; Mg AZ31; SS 316L

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03031052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a numerically stable and computationally efficient elasto-visco-plastic self-consistent (VPSC) crystal plasticity model, where the effect of elasticity on visco-plasticity is introduced as a perturbation to the visco-plastic regime. The perturbation enters as a fictitious visco-plastic eigen-strain rate and is derived from the elastic inclusion problem. As a consequence, the numerical efficiency of the VPSC model (Lebensohn and Tome 1993 Acta Metall. Mater. 41 2611-2624) is retained, with the added capability of predicting both, elastic and visco-plastic strain components in the grains. The proposed model (VPSC+) is validated by comparing with the self-consistent crystal plasticity model of Lebensohn and Tome (VPSC) (Lebensohn and Tome 1993 Acta Metall. Mater. 41 2611-2624), the elastic-rigid-plastic model (EPSC) of Turner and Tome (1994 Acta Metall. Mater. 42 4143-4153), and the elasto-visco-plastic model (EVPSC) developed by Wang et al (2010 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 58 594-612). The prediction of texture evolution, stress-strain response, strain rate sensitivity, and internal elastic strain evolution were consistent with those of the other models, in simulations of 316 L stainless steel and Mg AZ31 alloy. VPSC+ showed a superior numerical stability and computational speed when compared to EVPSC, and convergence was successfully achieved with relatively large increments. It is claimed that VPSC+ provides an elasto-VPSC constitutive law for polycrystalline metals applicable to simulation of large deformation, and which is numerically efficient for interfacing with finite element codes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据