4.7 Article

Tailored mesoporous nanocrystalline Ga2O3 degradation for dye-selective photocatalytic degradation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109600

关键词

Ga2O3; Porosity; Phase transform; Photocatalysis; Scavenger test; Mixed dye; Phenol

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), the Government of India
  2. University Grants Commission, Science and Engineering Research Board, the Govt. of India through 'University with Potential for Excellence scheme (UPE-II)'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous brick-like low dimensional Ga2O3 nanostructures were fabricated through a low-cost chemical route having different phases synthesized at different temperatures. The pore-density was varied by varying synthesis temperature and the materials exhibited a transformation from alpha-hexagonal to beta-monoclinic phase. With traditional structural and morphological characterization, detailed contaminant removal properties were investigated for the as-prepared samples. The green cleaning efficiency was recognized to be influenced by crystal structure, surface morphology and surface charge type of the catalyst. All of the synthesized material showed promising performance in degradation of traditional organic hazardous dyes like rhodamine B (RhB), methyl orange (MO) and apparently invisible harmful water soluble chemical like phenol. An interesting feature, i.e., obtaining dye specific adsorbent out of the same materials and the mechanism for the ion selective photo degradation process have been presented in this work. High degradation rate constants of 0.072 min(-1), 0.051 min(-1) and 0.18 min(-1) were obtained for RhB, MO and mixed dyes respectively with almost complete removal of the dyes. The role of intermediate radicals center dot OH,center dot O-2(-) and h(+) was correlated with catalytic performances depending upon modification of band positions of the dyes. The mesoporous Ga2O3 structures are hence inferred as potential candidates for future water safety issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据