4.7 Article

Simultaneous determination of paracetamol and p-aminophenol using glassy carbon electrode modified with nitrogen- and sulfur- co-doped carbon dots

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 186, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-3870-2

关键词

Simultaneous detection; Electrochemical sensor; Pharmaceutical analysis; Scanning electron microscopy; Brunauer-Emmett-Teller; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; Cyclic voltammetry; Differential pulse voltammetry; Nanoporous material

资金

  1. Innovation and entrepreneurship project for overseas high-level talents of Shenzhen [KQJSCX20180328165437711]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773680]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Walnut shell was processed for preparing nanoporous carbon, which further underwent element doping in order to boost its performance. A novel electrochemical sensor was then built by using the nitrogen and sulfur co-doped walnut shell carbon (N,S-WSC). Morphology and microstructure of the materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (de)sorption which showed that N,S-WSC has a large specific surface with abundant pores. Electrochemical properties of differently modified sensors were investigated by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. They demonstrated enhanced conductivity and enlarged surface after N,S co-doping. The modified electrode exhibits good catalytic ability towards paracetamol (ACOP) and p-aminophenol (PAP), and baseline separation of their oxidation peaks (peak potential difference is 0.24 V) allows for simultaneous detection of these two compounds. Under the optimal conditions, the calibration plot is linear in the 0.1 to 220 mu M ACOP concentration range, with a 26 nM detection limit. Response to PAP is linear from 1.0 to 300 mu M, and the detection limit is 38 nM (at S/N = 3). The sensor was successfully applied to quantify ACOP and PAP in tablets, and the accuracy of results is validated by HPLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据