4.7 Article

TMB-assembly as nanosubstrate construction colorimetric kit for highly sensitive and selective detection of H2O2 and monoamine oxidase-A based on Fenton reaction

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104177

关键词

TMB dot; Mao-A; H2O2; Colorimetric kit; Nanosubstrate

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0207201]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [21505072, 81672508, 21501091, 61505076]
  3. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics of Hunan University [2018008]
  4. China-Sweden Joint Mobility Project [51811530018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detection of H2O2 is significant for the applications in environmental protection, pharmaceutical industries, food production, and clinical control. Current colorimetric kit of H2O2 based on enzyme or nanomaterials always needs TMB or other peroxidases substrate as coloration species. Herein, we report a simple hydrothermal method to synthesize of TMB dot as the nanosubstrate construction colorimetric kit for highly selective and sensitive detection of H2O2 based on Fenton reaction. Compared with TMB as the substrate, the synthesized TMB dots (TMBDs) show higher reaction activity in the presence of the same low-level Fe2+ and H2O2, resulting in highly sensitive sensing H2O2 down to 0.8 nM. Additionally, the obtained TMBDs can well disperse in solution, while generally TMB as substrate needs to be dissolved in organic solvents such as DMF and DMSO. Furthermore, the developed colorimetric kit is applied in detection of Mao-A, due to the reaction between epinephrine and Mao-A producing H2O2. More importantly, the proposed method has been successfully applied to the analysis of Mao-A in spiked human serum Hence, the TMBDs as the nanosubstrate provide an efficient, fast and sensitive approach for colorimetric kit of H2O2 and Mao-A, promoting more extensive application in early diagnosis of disease and drug discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据