4.2 Article

Streptomycete origin of chromosomal replication with two putative unwinding elements

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 165, 期 12, 页码 1365-1375

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000859

关键词

Streptomyces; oriC; DNA replication

资金

  1. National Science Centere, Poland (MAESTRO Grant) [2012/04/A/NZ1/00057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA replication is controlled mostly at the initiation step. In bacteria, replication of the chromosome starts at a single origin of replication called oriC. The initiator protein. DnaA, binds to specific sequences (DnaA boxes) within oriC and assembles into a filament that promotes DNA double helix opening within the DNA unwinding element (DUE). This process has been thoroughly examined in model bacteria, including Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, but we have a relatively limited understanding of chromosomal replication initiation in other species. Here, we reveal new details of DNA replication initiation in Streptomyces, a group of Gram-positive soil bacteria that possesses a long linear (8-10 Mbps) and GC-rich chromosome with a centrally positioned oriC. We used comprehensive in silico, in vitro and in vivo analyses to better characterize the structure of Streptomyces oriC. We identified 14 DnaA-binding motifs and determined the consensus sequence of the DnaA box. Unexpectedly, our in silico analysis using the WebSIDD algorithm revealed the presence of two putative Streptomyces DUEs (DUE1 and DUE2) located very near one another toward the 5' end of the oriC region. in vitro P1 nuclease assay revealed that DNA unwinding occurs at both of the proposed sites, but using an in vivo replication initiation point mapping, we were able to confirm only one of them (DUE2). The previously observed transcriptional activity of the Streptomyces oriC region may help explain the current results. We speculate that transcription itself could modulate oriC activity in Streptomyces by determining whether DNA unwinding occurs at DUE1 or DUE2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据