4.5 Article

Repeated in-vitro and in-vivo exposure leads to genetic alteration, adaptations, and hypervirulence in Salmonella

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103654

关键词

Salmonella; Passage; Adaptation; Hypervirulence; Evolution; C. elegans

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), SERB, MHRD, Govt. of India [EMR/2016/001672, EEQ/2016/000676]
  2. NIT Rourkela
  3. NIT fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptation is an important phenomenon for the survival of any organism in various in-vitro and in-vivo conditions leading to their better survival. We studied Salmonella, for the evolutionary adaptation under different conditions. When Salmonella was passaged for 12 rounds in Luria Bertani (P12-STM) media, F media (F12-STM) and Caenorhabditis elegans (Ce12-STM), we found certain phenotypic variations with respect to unpassaged strain. The passaged strains showed a significant increase in motility, body size and number of flagella they possessed, increased tolerance to ROS and RNS under in-vitro condition. They were more invasive in the human intestinal epithelial cells (Int-407) and showed a higher proliferation rate in the phagocytic cells (U-937 and RAW-264.7) suggesting their efficient intracellular proliferation. The evolved strains were hyper-infectious and reduced host viability significantly in C. elegans. The upregulation of various virulent and regulatory genes observed could be associated with the evolved adaptive virulent phenotype by Salmonella in a given condition. Whole genome sequencing also indicates the genetic alteration including insertion and deletions, single nucleotide polymorphisms which are common in all the strains as well as exposure specific, giving varied phenotype among the passaged strains. This study indicates that Salmonella is showing adaptation, genetic alteration and have become hypervirulent hence is capable of causing disease severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据