4.4 Article

Post-periodontal surgery propounds early repair salivary biomarkers by 1H NMR based metabolomics

期刊

METABOLOMICS
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-019-1593-3

关键词

Periodontitis; Metabolomics; Saliva; Periodontal surgery; NMR spectroscopy; Metabolic profiling

资金

  1. ICMR, New Delhi [5/4/2-7-12-NCD-II]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Oral microflora is a well-orchestrated and acts as a sequential defense mechanism for any infection related to oral disease. Chronic periodontitis is a disease of a microbial challenge to symbiosis and homeostasis. Periodontal surgery is the most promising cure with repair process during periodontal regeneration. It has an encouraging outcome in terms of early recovery biomarkers. Objective Saliva of periodontal surgery subjects with the chronic periodontitis have been evaluated by H-1 NMR spectroscopy in search of possible early metabolic differences that could be obtained in order to see the eradication of disease which favours the symbiotic condition. Method The study employed H-1 NMR spectroscopy on 176 human saliva samples in search of distinctive differences and their spectral data were further subjected to multivariate and quantitative analysis. Result The H-1 NMR study of periodontal surgery samples shows clear demarcation and profound metabolic differences when compared with the diseased condition. Several metabolites such as lactate, ethanol, succinate, and glutamate were found to be of higher significance in periodontal surgery in contrast to chronic periodontitis subjects. The PLS-DA model of the studied group resulted in R-2 of 0.83 and Q(2) of 0.70. Conclusion Significant metabolites could be considered as early repair markers for chronic periodontitis disease as they are being restored to achieve symbiosis. The study, therefore, concluded the early recovery process of the diseased subjects with the restoration of possible metabolomic profile similar to the healthy controls [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据