4.5 Article

Tannic acid elicits selective antitumoral activity in vitro and inhibits cancer cell growth in a preclinical model of glioblastoma multiforme

期刊

METABOLIC BRAIN DISEASE
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 283-293

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11011-019-00519-9

关键词

Cancer; Tannic acid; Glioblastoma; Selectivity; Antioxidant; Animal model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is a devastating tumor affecting the central nervous system with infiltrative capacity, high proliferation rate and chemoresistance. Therefore, it is urgent to find new therapeutic alternatives that improve this prognosis. Herein, we focused on tannic acid (TA) a polyphenol with antioxidant and antiproliferative activities. In this work, the antitumor and antioxidant effects of TA on rat (C6) glioblastoma cells and their cytotoxicity relative to primary astrocyte cultures were evaluated in vitro. Cells were exposed to TA of 6.25 to 75 mu M for 24, 48 and/or 72 h. In addition, colony formation, migration and cell adhesion were analyzed and flow cytometry was used to analyze cell death and cell cycle. Next, the action of TA was evaluated in a preclinical glioblastoma model performed on Wistar rats. In this protocol, the animals were treated with a dose of 50 mg/kg/day TA for 15 days. Our results demonstrated that TA induced in vitro selective antiglioma activity, not demonstrating cytotoxicity in astrocyte culture. It induced cell death by apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, reducing formation and size of colonies, cell migration/adhesion and showing to be a potential antioxidant. Interestingly, the antiglioma effect was also observed in vivo, as TA decreased tumor volume by 55%, accompanied by an increase in the area of intratumoral necrosis and infiltration of lymphocytes without causing systemic damage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report TA activity in a GBM preclinical model. Thus, this natural compound is promising as a treatment for glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据