4.5 Review

Cardiovascular outcomes of liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 98, 期 46, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017860

关键词

GLP-1; liraglutide; type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [81525008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Liraglutide is a novel, long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the cardiovascular safety and benefits of liraglutide treatment on type 2 diabetes patients remain in debate. In this study, we aimed to examine the overall cardiovascular outcomes of liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge databases up to September 1st, 2017 for randomized trials in which type 2 diabetes patients were assigned to liraglutide and placebo or other comparators groups. Results: Eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria for inclusion and 14,608 patients were analyzed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We found patients in the liraglutide group had a lower risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, P=.002), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (RR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.99, P=.036), all-cause death (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96, P=.009), and cardiovascular death (RR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.91, P=.002) than all comparator groups. However, liraglutide treatment did not decrease incidence of stroke (RR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, P=.124). But among the MACE subgroups analysis, a significant reduction of MACE with liraglutide was only observed in placebo-controlled trials (RR= 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.96, P=.004) but not in studies concerning other comparators (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.29-1.16, P=.122). Conclusions: In conclusion, our results suggest that liraglutide treatment decreases the risk of MACE, AMI, all-cause death and cardiovascular death among patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据