4.7 Article

An investigation on the effect of powder recycling on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AISI 316L produced by Directed Energy Deposition

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138360

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Directed energy deposition; AISI 316L; Microstructure; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. European research project belonging to the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
  2. Borealis the 3A energy class Flexible Machine for the new Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing on next generation of complex 3D metal parts [633992]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Directed energy deposition (DED) has been employed to produce AISI 316L samples. Microstructure and primary cellular arm spacing (PCAS) are studied analysing the relationship with the cooling rate at the different heights of DED processed 316L stainless steel sample. It is found that, by increasing the deposition distance from the substrate, the PCAS of the sample increases from 2.9 to 4.5 mu m, as a consequence of the decreased cooling rate and thermal gradient. On the other hand, in the last deposited layers, the PCAS of the sample decreases from 4.5 to 3.3 mu m, because of the changes in cooling mechanisms. The phase composition of samples after deposition is revealed and compared with the predictions based on the Schaeffler and Pseudo-binary diagrams. It is revealed that the final microstructure is characterized by austenitic dendrites together with some residual delta ferrite located at dendritic arms location. Lastly, the effect of using fresh or recycled powders, on the microstructure and mechanical properties of DED 316L stainless steel parts is investigated. It is found that the samples fabricated using recycled powders have rather similar tensile strength levels, but much lower elongation than those produced using fresh powder due to a lower inclusions content and of their average lower size. The nature of these inclusions is discussed as well as the reason for their increase both in numbers and size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据