4.7 Article

Effect of process parameters on the microstructure, tensile strength and productivity of 316L parts produced by laser powder bed fusion

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.110016

关键词

Laser powder bed fusion; Additive manufacturing; 316L; Process parameters; Mechanical properties; Microstructure

资金

  1. Swedish Governmental Agency of Innovation Systems (Vinnova)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of process parameters during laser-powder bed fusion on the microstructure, tensile strength and build time of 316L parts is studied. By increasing both, scan speed and hatch distance, an improved productivity while maintaining acceptable properties were achieved. The samples were evaluated using volumetric energy density. The microstructure characterization showed that all produced samples had elongated grains aligned with the building direction independent on energy density that was used, whereas the grain size was strongly affected by the different energy densities. A high energy density resulted in larger grains with a very strong < 101 > crystallographic orientation while the lower energy generated small grains with a random crystallographic orientation. This indicates how both, crystallographic orientation and grain size, can be tailored by altering the energy density. Even if a large variance in microstructure was observed, the tensile test results only showed about 5% difference in yield strength between standard process parameters and the samples produced with the lowest energy density but with a 20% faster build time. Due to the decreased energy density, the amount of defects was increased which had a negative effect on the elongation. The samples produced with the lowest energy density had 32% elongation compared to 45% for the samples produced with standard process parameters. This study clearly indicates that the build time can be improved while maintaining good mechanical properties by adjusting the process parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据