4.7 Article

Laminae characteristics and influence on shale gas reservoir quality of lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Jiaoshiba area of the Sichuan Basin, China

期刊

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 839-851

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.06.022

关键词

Laminae; Shale gas; Reservoir quality; Longmaxi formation; Sichuan basin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41702149, 41802146]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2016ZX05060]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622559]
  4. Jianghan Oilfield Company, SINOPEC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Widely developed in shale strata, laminae are the most typical shale sedimentary structure. To investigate their influence on shale gas reservoir quality, we conducted complementary studies by integrating microscopic observations, geochemical analyses, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) imaging, and mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) techniques. The microscopic observation of thin sections enabled us to detect the laminae characteristics, including the density and maximum thickness of individual lamina, and three types and stages of lamina development were identified. The total organic carbon (TOC) content, mineral composition, natural fracture, pore type, pore size distribution, porosity, permeability, and tortuosity were investigated in these different laminae types using FE-SEM, MICP and geochemical analysis. Combining the laminae characteristics and pore structure, we concluded that the organic pores and total pore area are mainly affected by the TOC content, whereas the development of the laminae controls the inorganic macropore scale and affects the pore size distribution. In addition, we found that the excessive development of shale laminae is not conducive to organic matter accumulation because of the change in redox condition, and because it has an adverse impact on the formation of complex artificial fractures during hydraulic fracturing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据