4.5 Article

Imaging diamagnetic susceptibility of collagen in hepatic fibrosis using susceptibility tensor imaging

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 1322-1330

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27995

关键词

liver cirrhosis; liver fibrosis; magnetic susceptibility anisotropy; quantitative susceptibility mapping; susceptibility tensor imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To characterize the magnetic susceptibility changes of liver fibrosis using susceptibility tensor imaging. Methods Liver biopsy tissue samples of patients with liver fibrosis were obtained. Three-dimensional gradient-echo and diffusion-weighted images were acquired at 9.4 T. Susceptibility tensors of the samples were calculated using the gradient-echo phase signal acquired at 12 different orientations relative to the B-0 field. Susceptibility anisotropy of the liver collagen fibers was quantified and compared with diffusion anisotropy, measured by DTI. For validation, a comparison was made to histology including hematoxylin and eosin staining, iron staining, and Masson's trichrome staining. Results Areas with strong diamagnetic susceptibility were observed in the tissue samples forming fibrous patterns. This diamagnetic susceptibility was highly anisotropic. Both the mean magnetic susceptibility and susceptibility anisotropy of collagen fibers exhibited a strong contrast against the surrounding nonfibrotic tissues. The same regions also showed an elevated diffusion anisotropy but with much lower tissue contrast. Masson's trichrome staining identified concentrated collagens in the fibrous regions with high susceptibility anisotropy, and a linear correlation was found between the susceptibility anisotropy and the histology-based staging. Conclusion Diamagnetic susceptibility indicates the presence of collagen in the fibrotic liver tissues. Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropy may serve as a potential marker to quantify collagen fiber changes in patients with liver fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据