4.6 Article

A Bespoke Force Field To Describe Biomolecule Adsorption at the Aqueous Boron Nitride Interface

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 35, 期 49, 页码 16234-16243

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03121

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office for Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-18-1-0329]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable manipulation of the interface between 2D nanomaterials and biomolecules represents a current frontier in nanoscience. The ability to resolve the molecular-level structures of these biointerfaces would provide a fundamental data set that is needed to enable systematic and knowledge-based progress in this area. These structures are challenging to obtain via experiment alone, and molecular simulations offer a complementary approach to address this problem. Compared with graphene, the interface between hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) and biomolecules is relatively understudied at present. While several force fields are currently available for modeling the h-BN/water interface, there is a lack of a suitable force field that can describe the interactions between h-BN, liquid water, and biomolecules. Here, we use density functional theory calculations to create a force field, BoNi-CHARMM, to describe biomolecular interactions at the aqueous h-BN interface. Verifying our force field presents an additional challenge, given the scarcity of available experimental data for these interfaces. We test our force field against experimental evidence regarding the water/surface contact angle and confirm that the force field provides experimentally consistent values. We also present preliminary data regarding predictions of the free energy of adsorption of a selection of amino acids at the aqueous h-BN interface, revealing arginine and tryptophan to be among the strongest binders. This force field provides an opportunity to initiate a systematic progression in our current understanding of how to capture the intermolecular interactions at the h-BN biointerface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据