4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Outcomes and safety of electronic consult use in vascular surgery

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 1726-1732

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.231

关键词

eConsult; Access to care; Communication; Coordination of care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine how electronic consults (eConsults) are used in vascular surgery in a veterans health care setting and whether their use is safe for patients. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all eConsults completed by the vascular surgery service at the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Healthcare System between October 10, 2012 and November 15, 2013. Patients' demographics and comorbidities were collected. eConsult recommendations and patient and provider compliance with recommendations were collected. Data on adverse outcomes up to 1 year after consultation and data on all-cause mortality at 1 year and 5 years were collected. Results: Between October 10, 2012 and November 15, 2013, of 350 eConsults completed, 123 (35%) were for peripheral artery disease, 93 (27%) for carotid stenosis, and 57 (16%) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Unique recommendations were made for 291 consults (83%). Medication recommendations were made in 140 consults (40%). The most commonly recommended medication was cilostazol. Compliance with medication recommendations ranged from 30% to 61%. Noninvasive imaging was recommended in 220 consults (60.3%). Procedures overall were recommended in only six consults (1.7%). Five-year all-cause mortality for categorized diagnoses ranged from 8.3% for nonabdominal aneurysm to 28.1% for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Conclusions: Within the Veterans Affairs vascular surgery service, eConsults provide a safe and effective means of triaging and providing recommendations for patients with vascular disease. eConsults used to augment traditional consultations may provide an important means of reducing clinic congestion for providers and reducing time and cost for patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据