4.5 Article

Sustainable supply chain coordination under competition and green effort scheme

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 304-319

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1671152

关键词

Sustainable supply chain coordination; green effort; cooperative investment; sustainability competition; carbon emissions tax

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article contributes to the literature on supply chain coordination by proposing a novel model for coordinating sustainable supply chain (SSC) under competition. The results indicate that the proposed coordination contract improves the overall profit and sustainability performance of SSC, and is efficient from both economic and sustainability viewpoints.
In supply chain (SC) context, many SC members make sustainability effort not only to help the environment but also promote the market demand. Under such a situation, effective strategies should be adopted to coordinate the members' sustainability decisions such as carbon emission reduction and green effort decisions. This article makes contributions to the literature on SC coordination by proposing a novel model for coordinating sustainable supply chain (SSC) under competition. In this investigation, a manufacturer invests to reduce the carbon emissions and two retailers compete on investing in the green effort. Firstly, the profit of SSC members and optimal decisions are determined under the decentralised and centralised systems. Then, a three-party compensation-based contract is proposed for coordinating the SSC decisions and a Nash bargaining model is proposed to fairly share the surplus profit. The results indicate that the proposed contract not only improves the whole SSC profit and its members compared to the decentralised system, but also improves the whole SSC performance regarding sustainability. Therefore, the coordination contract is applicable and efficient from both economic and sustainability viewpoints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据