4.7 Article

Novel auxiliary saturation compensation design for neuroadaptive NTSM tracking control of high speed trains with actuator saturation

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.11.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61573263, 61703314, 61673055, 61673056, 61603274, 61773056]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of USTB [FRF-GF-18-026B, 230201606500061, FRF-BD-19-002A]
  3. Open Project Program of Engineering Research Center for Metallurgical Automation and Measurement Technology of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology [MADTOF2019A02]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110047, 2017M610046]
  5. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1401203]
  6. Beijing Key Discipline Development Program [XK100080537]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel auxiliary saturation compensation system is constructed to eliminate the negative effect of asymmetric nonlinear actuator saturation (ANAS). Two chatter-free neuroadaptive sliding mode tracking control strategies are proposed by combining nonsingular terminal sliding mode (NTSM) control technique with radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) for high speed trains for resp., the actuator saturation-free and ANAS saturation cases. These two control strategies are used to guarantee that the closed-loop signals are bounded and the steady-state tracking errors converge to a residual around zero. The common assumption that the initial velocities of the train and the desired trajectory are zero, is removed in this paper. In addition, the computationally inexpensive strategy contains an optimized NN adaptation mechanism where only one parameter requires online updating no matter how many neurons are chosen. Finally, numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the validity of the proposed control strategies. (C) 2019 The Franklin Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据