4.7 Article

ACC/AHA/HRS Versus ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope JACC Guideline Comparison

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 74, 期 19, 页码 2410-2423

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.012

关键词

bifascicular block; clinical practice guidelines; electrophysiological study; implantable loop recorder; orthostatic hypotension; permanent pacemaker; reflex syncope; syncope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Syncope is a commonly encountered and challenging problem in medical practice. Presentations are variable, and the causal mechanism often remains elusive even after extensive (and often expensive) evaluation. Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to help guide the multidisciplinary approach necessary to diagnose and manage the broad spectrum of patients presenting with syncope. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society, published its first syncope guidelines in 2017. The European Society of Cardiology released the fourth iteration of its syncope guidelines in 2018. This review highlights the differences and congruencies between the 2 sets of recommendations, their implications for clinical practice, the remaining gaps in understanding, and areas of future research. (C) 2019 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据