4.8 Article

Time-Dependent Switching of Constitutional Dynamic Libraries and Networks from Kinetic to Thermodynamic Distributions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 141, 期 46, 页码 18560-18569

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09395

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC [SUPRADAPT 290585]
  2. USIAS
  3. University of Strasbourg
  4. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution of the constituents of a constitutional dynamic library (CDL) may undergo time-dependent changes as a function of the kinetics of the processes generating the CDL from its components. Thus, the constitutional dynamic network (CDN) representing the connections between the constituents changes from a kinetic distribution to the thermodynamic one as a function of time. We investigated the behavior of dynamic covalent libraries (DCLs) of four constituents generated by reversible formation of C=N bonds between four components, 2 aldehydes and 2 amino compounds, both in absence and in the presence of metal cations. The associated [2 X 2] networks underwent time-dependent changes from the initial kinetic distribution to the final thermodynamic one, involving an orthogonal switch from one diagonal to the other diagonal of the square [2 X 2] network leading to a very large change in distribution. The DCL constituents could be switched from kinetic products (imines) to thermodynamic products (oximes or acylhydrazones) based on the reactivities of the components and the thermodynamic stabilities of the constituents without addition of any external effector, solely on the basis of the intrinsic properties of the self-contained system. Such processes were achieved for purely organic DCLs/CDNs as well as for inorganic ones containing two metal cations, the latter changing from the silver(I) complex of an imine (kinetic product) to the zinc(II) complex of a hydrazone (thermodynamic product). The results bear relationship to out-of-equilibrium systems concerning kinetic behavior in adaptive chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据