4.4 Article

Automated Bridge Inspection Using Mobile Ground Robotics

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 145, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002404

关键词

-

资金

  1. Region of Waterloo
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council of Canada (Canada Research Chairs programs)
  5. Ontario Graduate Scholarship programs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of mobile ground and aerial robotics presents a powerful means to augment current visual inspection practice by overcoming some common weaknesses related to accessibility, repeatability, hidden defect detection, and quantification. In this paper, a novel ground robotic bridge inspection platform consisting of a rugged mobile platform equipped with an onboard computer and several calibrated and time-synchronized sensors is introduced. This platform, along with custom localization and mapping software, is shown to produce high-quality 3D point cloud maps for the underside of typical concrete bridges, which are often the most challenging to inspect. The quality of these maps is compared to ground truth using terrestrial laser scanner measurements and the maps are shown to have an overall scale error of just 1.3%. The maps from the proposed system can be generated in real time, while continuously scanning the bridge, resulting in a significant reduction in the inspection time compared to using a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS). Additionally, this work presents a novel procedure for fully automated point cloud colorization and semiautomated defect localization and quantification. The former allows for realistic visual renderings of the bridge for remote inspection by offsite inspectors. The latter allows for increased accuracy of defect quantification compared to traditional inspections, while eliminating subjectivity between inspections and inspectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据