4.4 Article

Juvenile fish habitat across the inner Danish waters: Habitat association models and habitat growth models for European plaice, flounder and common sole informed by a targeted survey

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2019.101795

关键词

Juvenile habitat; Inner Danish waters; Baltic Sea; Transitional waters; Habitat suitability; Growth modelling; Habitat association modelling

资金

  1. European Marine Fisheries Fund via the Danish Fisheries Agency project FishHab-II
  2. European Marine Fisheries Fund via the Danish Fisheries Agency project Sole of the IDW
  3. Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark through the Danish Marine Coastal Fisheries Management Program (Marin Fiskepleje)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The management of coastal fisheries and coastal marine areas both require information on the use and importance of coastal marine habitats for marine species. This information is certainly pertinent for exploited species dependent on these coastal habitats for specific life-history stages. This study uses two different measures of habitat suitability to build Habitat Association Models (HAMs) and Habitat Growth Models (HGMs) for juveniles of three commercially and recreationally important fish species (Pleuronectes platessa, Platichthys fiesus, and Solea solea) of the Inner Danish Waters (IDW). A large scale, one-off juvenile survey was used to collect juvenile fish and directly observed environmental data. The survey informed Generalised Linear (Mixed) Models (GLMs and GLMMs), which were fit and run through repeated random sub-sampling cross-validation before being utilised to build interpolative maps of both prediction and model uncertainty. The limitations of this approach are discussed in reference to the future works required to complement and improve such static habitat suitability maps. These results can be used to inform marine spatial planning and future work into the role of juvenile habitats in supporting fishery species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据