4.7 Article

LFQ-Analyst: An Easy-To-Use Interactive Web Platform To Analyze and Visualize Label-Free Proteomics Data Preprocessed with MaxQuant

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 204-211

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00496

关键词

MaxQuant; automated data analysis; label-free quantification; R; ShinyApp; web-based software tool

资金

  1. office of the Vice Provost for Research and Research Infrastructure (VPRRI) at Monash University
  2. Bioplatforms Australia (BPA) as part of the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relative label-free quantification (LFQ) of shotgun proteomics data using precursor (MS1) signal intensities is one of the most commonly used applications to comprehensively and globally quantify proteins across biological samples and conditions. Due to the popularity of this technique, several software packages, such as the popular software suite MaxQuant, have been developed to extract, analyze, and compare spectral features and to report quantitative information of peptides, proteins, and even post-translationally modified sites. However, there is still a lack of accessible tools for the interpretation and downstream statistical analysis of these complex data sets, in particular for researchers and biologists with no or only limited experience in proteomics, bioinformatics, and statistics. We have therefore created LFQ-Analyst, which is an easy-to-use, interactive web application developed to perform differential expression analysis with one click and to visualize label-free quantitative proteomic data sets preprocessed with MaxQuant. LFQ-Analyst provides a wealth of user-analytic features and offers numerous publication-quality result graphics to facilitate statistical and exploratory analysis of label-free quantitative data sets. LFQ-Analyst, including an in-depth user manual, is freely available at https://bioinformatics.erc.monash.edu/apps/LFQ-Analyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据