4.8 Review

Quasi-solid-state electrolytes for lithium sulfur batteries: Advances and perspectives

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 438, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226985

关键词

Lithium-sulfur battery; Quasi-solid-state electrolyte; Lithium metal electrode; Polysulfide shuttle effect

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Cornpetitividad of the Spanish Government through Proyectos I + D Retos program [ENE2015-64907-C2-1-R]
  2. Basque Government through the GV-ELKARTEK-2016 program
  3. Basque Government [1-AFW-2017-2]
  4. Spanish Government [FJCI-2015-23898]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are emerging as attractive power sources for light-weight applications (e.g., unmanned aerial and autonomous underwater vehicles) and large electric vehicles (such as trucks and buses) incentivized by their low-cost and high theoretical gravimetric energy density. The replacement of liquid electrolytes with solid-state electrolytes offers a perfect opportunity to improve the safety and energy density of Li-S batteries; however, poor interfacial contact and/or low ionic conductivity at room temperature in the absence of liquid components severely handicap the electrochemical performance of all solid-state Li-S batteries. With the addition of a minimum amount of a liquid plasticizer, a compound which can effectively mitigate the interfacial issues and enhance the ionic transport in both electrolyte and electrode, quasi-solid-state electrolytes (QSSEs) for Li-S batteries, have gained significant attention in recent years. In this review, recent advances and progresses on the development of quasi-solid-state Li-S batteries (QSSLSBs) are scrutinized. Strategies on building high-performance QSSLSBs using polymer-based and inorganic-based QSSEs are intensively discussed on the basis of estimated practical energy density in each cell configuration. Challenges and future directions on the improvement of QSSLSBs are also presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据