4.5 Article

Orthogonal Techniques to Study the Effect of pH, Sucrose, and Arginine Salts on Monoclonal Antibody Physical Stability and Aggregation During Long-Term Storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 584-594

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.10.065

关键词

monoclonal antibody(s); pH; sucrose; arginine; physical stability; protein aggregation; protein formulation; fluorescence spectroscopy; light scattering (dynamic); nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy

资金

  1. EU [675074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the effects of additives on therapeutic protein stability is of paramount importance for obtaining stable formulations. In this work, we apply several high- and medium-throughput methods to study the physical stability of a model monoclonal antibody at pH 5.0 and 6.5 in the presence of sucrose, arginine hydrochloride, and arginine glutamate. In low ionic strength buffer, the addition of salts reduces the antibody colloidal and thermal stability, attributed to screening of electrostatic interactions. The presence of glutamate ion in the arginine salt partially reduces the damaging effect of ionic strength increase. The addition of 280 mM sucrose shifts the thermal protein unfolding to a higher temperature. Arginine salts in the used concentration reduce the relative monomer yield after refolding from urea, whereas sucrose has a favorable effect on antibody refolding. In addition, we show 12-month long-term stability data and observe correlations between thermal protein stability, relative monomer yield after refolding, and monomer loss during storage. The monomer loss during storage is related to protein aggregation and formation of subvisible particles in some of the formulations. This study shows that the effect of commonly used additives on the long-term antibody physical stability can be predicted using orthogonal biophysical measurements. (C) 2020 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据