4.5 Review

Stress Factors in mAb Drug Substance Production Processes: Critical Assessment of Impact on Product Quality and Control Strategy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 116-133

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.09.023

关键词

stress factor; protein degradation; interfacial stress; oxidation; conformational stability; colloidal stability; unfolding; aggregation; particle; chemical modifications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The success of biotherapeutic development heavily relies on establishing robust production platforms. During the manufacturing process, the protein is exposed to multiple stress conditions that can result in physical and chemical modifications. The modified proteins may raise safety and quality concerns depending on the nature of the modification. Therefore, the protein modifications potentially resulting from various process steps need to be characterized and controlled. This commentary brings together expertise and knowledge from biopharmaceutical scientists and discusses the various manufacturing process steps that could adversely impact the quality of drug substance (DS). The major process steps discussed here are commonly used in mAb production using mammalian cells. These include production cell culture, harvest, antibody capture by protein A, virus inactivation, polishing by ion-exchange chromatography, virus filtration, ultrafiltration-diafiltration, compounding followed by release testing, transportation and storage of final DS. Several of these process steps are relevant to protein DS production in general. The authors attempt to critically assess the level of risk in each of the DS processing steps, discuss strategies to control or mitigate protein modification in these steps, and recommend mitigation approaches including guidance on development studies that mimic the stress induced by the unit operations. (C) 2020 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据