4.5 Article

Geochemical characteristics and effectiveness of thick, black shales in southwestern depression, Tarim Basin

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106607

关键词

Southwestern depression; Depositional environment; Red algae; Hydrocarbon potential; Oil-source correlation; Tarim basin

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2016ZX04004-004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672125]
  3. Liu Baojun Geoscience Youth Science Foundation [DMSM2017068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An interval of black shales deposited from Precambrian to lower Cambrian from the southwestern depression of the Tarim basin (SDTB) was systematically evaluated in terms of hydrocarbon potential, organic matter, depositional environment and oil-source relationship. The shales have good TOC contents (up to 3.15%) but low S-1+S-2 values (<0.03 mg/g), indicating the source rocks are currently at high thermal maturities. The relationship between pristane/n-C-17 and phytane/n-C-18 indicates the kerogen was oil prone and dominant by algal input. Furthermore, the depositional environment had relatively moderate salinity and stratified water environment indicated by G/C30H ratios (0.15-0.24). The high algal input may have enhanced TOC preservation under reducing conditions reflected by high dibenzothiophene content and low pristane/phytane ratios (mean 0.79). Thus, these source rocks may have generated a significant amount of oil during their geological history. Additionally, in view of the molecular geochemistry indicators, the extracts of black shales hold marked differences with the Cambrian-Ordovician end-member oils, but are quite similar to oils in the northeastern portion of the SDTB. It means that the lightly explored SDTB may contain significant hydrocarbon resources, and coeval source rocks in the ultra-deep portion of the basin may have contributed to the prolific petroleum resources in the Tarim Basin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据