4.5 Article

Effects of oligomers dissolved in CO2 or associated gas on IFT and miscibility pressure with a gas-light crude oil system

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106210

关键词

Associated gas; Miscible gas injection; Thickened gas; Equilibrium interfacial tension; Minimum miscibility pressure; First contact miscibility pressure; Cloud point pressure

资金

  1. Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) in Oman
  2. Ministry of Oil and Gas (MOG) in Oman
  3. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University), China [PLN201705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solubility of an oligomer in a supercritical gas solvent (e.g. CO2 or associated gas (AG) mixture) and the subsequent effects on the phase behaviour, interfacial tension (IFT) and miscibility pressure of the in-situ oil/oligomer-thickened gas system at a molecular level are crucial to understanding and designing a thickened miscible gas injection (MGI) process. We have conducted cloud point pressure measurements, which revealed that the phase behaviour of P-1-D-thickened CO2 would follow a UCST (upper critical solution temperature) trend while P-1-D-thickened AG mixture would lie close to a LCST (lower critical solution temperature) behaviour. Moreover, our measured equilibrium IFTs of crude oil/P-1-D-thickened CO2 system and crude oil/PVEE-thickened CO2 system were found to be slightly lower than those of the crude oil/CO2 system. This results in a slight reduction in the MMP (minimum miscibility pressure) and considerable reduction in the first contact miscibility pressure (P-max). We found the dissolution of P-1-D in the AG mixture to cause an increase in the equilibrium IFT for the crude oil/P-1-D-thickened AG mixture system, resulting in an increase in both of the MMP and P-max. This indicates that the dissolution of an oligomer may have a considerable effect on the crude oil/thickened gas IFT behaviour at a pressure close to the cloud point pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据