4.1 Article

Variation in Serious Illness Communication among Surgical Patients Receiving Palliative Care

期刊

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 411-414

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0268

关键词

natural language processing; palliative care communication; surgical palliative care

资金

  1. Society of University Surgeons-KARL STORZ Resident Research Award (2017-2018)
  2. Paul B. Beeson Emerging Leaders Career Development Award in Aging [1K76AG054859-01]
  3. American Federation for Aging Research
  4. Cambia Health Foundation
  5. Cambia Health Foundation Sojourns Scholar Leadership Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Natural language processing (NLP), a form of computer-assisted data abstraction, rapidly identifies serious illness communication domains such as code-status confirmation and goals of care (GOC) discussions within free-text notes, using a codebook of phrases. Differences in the phrases associated with palliative care for patients with different types of illness are unknown. Objective: To compare communication of code-status clarification and GOC discussions between patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing palliative procedures and patients admitted with life-threatening trauma. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: Patients with in-hospital admissions within two academic medical centers. Measurements: Sensitivity and specificity of NLP-identified communication domains compared with manual review. Results: Among patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (n = 523), NLP identified code-status clarification in 54% of admissions and GOC discussions in 49% of admissions. The sensitivity and specificity for code-status clarification were 94% and 99% respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity for a GOC discussion were 93% and 100%, respectively. Using the same codebook in patients with life-threatening trauma (n = 2093), NLP identified code-status clarification in 25.9% of admissions and GOC discussions in 6.3% of admissions. While NLP identification had 100% specificity, the sensitivity for code-status clarification and GOC discussion was reduced to 86% and 50%, respectively. Adding dynamic phrases such as ongoing discussions and phrases related to family meetings increased the sensitivity of the NLP codebook for code status to 98% and for GOC discussions to 100%. Conclusions: Communication of code status and GOC differ between patients with advanced cancer and those with life-threatening trauma. Recognition of these differences can aid in identification in patterns of palliative care delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据