4.5 Article

Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Targeted Treatment for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 389-396

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6551

关键词

cerebrovascular autoregulation; critical care; optimal cerebral perfusion pressure; pressure reactivity index; traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. Research Council of Lithuania [MIP-087/2015]
  2. European Commission FP7-HEALTH [602150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of individual therapy targets is critical for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Clinical outcomes depend on cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) impairment. Here, we compare the effectiveness of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt)-targeted therapy in younger (<45 years of age) and elderly (>= 45 years of age) TBI patients. Single-center multi-modal invasive arterial blood pressure(t), intracranial pressure (ICP)(t), cerebral perfusion pressure CPP(t), and CPPopt(t) monitoring (n = 81) was performed. ICM+ software was used for continuous CPPopt(t) status assessment by identification of pressure reactivity index (PRx). The most significant prognostic factors were age, Glasgow Coma Scale, serum glucose, and duration of longest CA ompairment event (LCAI) when PRx(t) >0.5 within 24 h after admission. The modeled accuracies for favorable and unfavorable outcome prediction were 86.5% and 90.9%, respectively. Age above 45 years and averaged ICP during all monitoring time above 21.3 mm Hg was associated with unfavorable outcome of an individual patient. Averaged CPP values close to CPPopt were associated with a better outcome in younger patients. Averaged Delta CPPopt <-5.0 mm Hg, averaged PRx >0.36, and LCAI >100 min were significantly associated with mortality for the younger patients. The critical values of averaged PRx >0.26 and LCAI >61 min were significantly associated with mortality for the elderly group. Autoregulation-guided treatment was important for individual TBI management, especially in younger patients. Further randomized multi-center studies are needed to prove final benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据