4.6 Article

Charles H. Frazier's craniopharyngioma treatment: the pivotal role of the transfrontal approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 133, 期 6, 页码 1739-1752

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191508

关键词

Charles Frazier; craniopharyngioma; hypothalamus; pituitary gland; Rathke's cleft cyst; subfrontal approach; third ventricle; radiotherapy; pituitary surgery; history

资金

  1. 2018 Wood Institute Travel Grants by The College of Physicians of Philadelphia
  2. Mutter Museum and Historical Medical Library of The College of Physicians of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  3. 2018 Wood Institute Travel Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charles H. Frazier (1870-1936), one of the pioneers of neurosurgery in the US, is known worldwide for devising surgical procedures to relieve trigeminal neuralgia and intractable pain. Less well-known are his substantial contributions to understanding and treating pituitary and parahypophyseal lesions. Along with Bernard Alpers, he defined Rathke's cleft tumors as a different pathological entity from adenomas and hypophyseal stalk tumors (craniopharyngiomas [CPs]). The surgical challenge posed by CPs piqued Frazier's interest in these lesions, although he never published a complete account of his CP series. An examination of the Charles Frazier papers at the College of Physicians of Philadelphia allowed the authors to identify 54 CPs that he had treated during his career. In the early 1910s, Frazier developed the subfrontal approach, which would become the primary surgical route to access these lesions, providing better control of the adjacent vital neurovascular structures than the transsphenoidal route hitherto used. Nevertheless, strong adhesions between CPs and the third ventricle floor, the major reason underlying Frazier's disappointing results, moved him to advocate incomplete tumor removal followed by radiotherapy to reduce both the risk of hypothalamic injury and CP recurrence. This conservative strategy remains a judicious treatment for CPs to this day.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据