4.7 Article

An overview of graphene oxide supported semiconductors based photocatalysts: Properties, synthesis and photocatalytic applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111826

关键词

Graphene oxide; Semiconductors; GO/Semiconductors based photocatalysts

资金

  1. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province, China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672113, 21975110, 21972058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene oxide (GO), which have many different oxygen-having groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl) is a tremendous graphene derivative and two dimensional carbon molecule. It was believed as a superb catalyst support and promoter for its large specific surface, carrier mobility and high optical transmittance. Explorers across multiple disciplines were paid huge concentration to it owing to the unique physiochemical characteristics. In this review, hybrids of graphene oxide and semiconductors promise photocatalysts owing to their flexible properties and the large number of synthesis variables obtainable for modifications. Recent developments were confirmed that the GO supported semiconductors based photocatalysts can be predictable as the most privileged and hopeful novel photocatalysts in the photocatalytic applications. Furthermore, we were discussed important progresses in an efficient GO supported semiconductors based nanocomposites, including the common preparation approaches and development mechanisms, as well as their recent applications such as, removal of contaminates, H-2 evolution and CO2 reduction. This significant review ends with an outline and some perceptions on the challenges and new instructions in investigating GO supported semiconductors based photocatalysts. It is also believed that this review will encourage further exploration and will inaugurate new possibilities to increase new hybrid GO based semiconductors photocatalysts with new and inspiring applications. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据