4.7 Article

Effect of oscillating temperature and crystallization on graphene oxide composite pervaporation membrane for inland brine desalination

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 588, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117210

关键词

Oscillating temperature pervaporation; Crystallization; Concentrated inland brine; Graphene oxide

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane distillation (MD) for desalination experienced technical challenges when treating concentrated inland brine with high salinity under industrially-relevant oscillating temperature condition or solar desalination. In this study, we fabricated a composite membrane using graphene oxide (GO) and used it in a pervaporation (PV) process to tackle the issues encountered in the MD processes. The resultant GO composite membranes demonstrated fast water vapor transport through nano-channels between the GO interlayers. In addition, the smoother and negatively charged surface offered by the GO layer hindered the undesired crystal deposition on the membrane surface, and therefore giving a substantially improved performance than the MD process when operated under oscillating temperature. More importantly, the presence of divalent cations in inland brine led to a naturally-occurring crosslinking between the GO nanosheets that offered molecular sieving functionality to the GO layer, preventing the transport of salt ions, as well as GO swelling and therefore providing exceptional performance sustainability, especially under oscillating temperature condition. Interestingly, it was found that GO composite membrane in a PV process for desalination offered greater overall water productivity when operated under the oscillating temperature compared to the constant temperature. These GO composite membranes also demonstrated good performance stability after chemical cleaning and when exposed to minor contaminants found in inland brine such as humic acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据