4.5 Article

Experimental investigation on jet fires hazards in a reduced pressure: Assessment of the main width features

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103984

关键词

Jet fires hazards; Width features; Flame geometry; Reduced pressure

资金

  1. National Nature Foundation of China [51976051, 51776060, 51606057]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [JZ2018HGTB0256, PA2019GDQT0014]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China [2018T110625, 2016M590580]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the main width features of jet fires hazards in a reduced pressure. Although previous researchers have paid much attention to main geometrical features in atmospheric pressure, the variation characteristics of flame width features in sub-atmospheric pressures has been rarely studied. Elucidating the distinctions of width in a jet diffusion flame in sub-atmospheric (Lhasa: 0.64 atm) and atmospheric pressure (Hefei: 1.0 atm) is of great importance to understand the physical mechanisms of combustion dynamics. Thus, experiments were conducted with 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 mm nozzles and propane was used as the fuel. Results have shown that the flame width in both pressures increases by increasing the heat release rate. And the flame width is significantly wider for nozzles with larger diameters in both pressures. The flame width normalized by the flame height in both pressure environments decreases by increasing the heat release rate. However, the results in subatmospheric pressures are significantly lower than that in normal pressure, indicating turbulent buoyant jet flame tends to be thinner in reduced pressure. A physical model was employed to characterize the variation of flame width in both sub-atmospheric and atmospheric pressures. The experimental results, obtained in this work and in previous studies, correlate with a good agreement using the present model. This work is a significant supplement to the flame geometrical features of turbulent buoyant jet fires from previous results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据