4.3 Article

Association between coarse particulate matter (PM10-2.5) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma among Taiwanese men

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 419-424

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1136/jim-2019-001119

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan [MOST 104-2420-H-040-001, 105-2627-M-040-002, 106-2627-M-040002, 106-EPA-F-016-001, 107-EPA-F-017-002, MOST 108-2621-M-040001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nasopharyngeal tract traps mainly coarse particles in inhaled air. Soluble carcinogenic compounds, endotoxins, and trace metals contained in these particles are potential causes of inflammation and oxidative stress which could enhance carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine the association between coarse particulate matter (PM10-2.5) and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). A total of 521,098 men (355 cases and 520,743 non-cases), aged >= 40 years were included in this study. Data were retrieved from the Taiwan Cancer Registry, the Adult Preventive Medical Services Database, and the Air Quality Monitoring Database. PM10-2.5 was significantly associated with a higher risk of NPC after adjusting for SO2, NOx, O-3, age, body mass index, smoking, alcohol drinking, betel nut chewing, exercise, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. With PM10-2.5<20.44 mu g/m(3) as the reference, the ORs and 95% CIs were 1.47; 1.03-2.11, 1.34; 0.94-1.91, and 1.68; 1.16-2.44 for 20.44 <= PM10-2.5<24.08, 24.08 <= PM10-2.5<29.27, and PM(10-2.5 >=)29.27 mu g/m(3), respectively. PM10-2.5 remained significantly associated with a higher risk of NPC after further adjustments were made for the aforementioned covariates and PM2.5. The ORs; 95% CIs were 1.42; 0.96 to 2.12, 1.41; 0.94 to 2.10, and 1.71; 1.10 to 2.66 for 20.44 <= PM10-2.5<24.08, 24.08 <= PM10-2.5<29.27, and PM10-2.5 >= 29.27 mu g/m(3), respectively. In conclusion, PM10-2.5 was significantly associated with a higher risk of NPC in Taiwanese men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据