4.4 Article

A novel fuzzy k-means latent semantic analysis (FKLSA) approach for topic modeling over medical and health text corpora

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 6573-6588

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-182776

关键词

Topic modeling; bag-of-words; term weighting; fuzzy k-means; principal component analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medical and health text documents pose a challenge for data handling and retrieving the relevant and meaningful documents. Automatically retrieval of significant knowledge with a better understanding of medical and health documents is a challenging task. One popular approach for thematically understand the medical and health text documents and finding the topics from these documents is topic modeling. In this research, we propose a novel topic modeling approach Fuzzy k-means latent semantic analysis (FKLSA) by using the fuzzy clustering. Our method generates local and global term frequencies through the bag of words (BOW) model. Principal component analysis is used for removing high dimensionality negative impact on global term weighting. Previous work shows that in medical and health documents redundancy issue has a negative impact on the quality of text mining Therefore, the main achievement of FKLSA is the handling of the redundancy issue in medical and text documents and discover semantically more precise topics. FKLSA is socially utilized for finding the themes from medical and health text corpus. These topics are further used for text classification and clustering tasks in text mining Experimental results show that FKLSA performs better than LDA and RedLDA for redundant corpora. FKLSA's time performance is also stable with an increase in number of topics and thus better than LDA and LSA on a big twitter heath dataset. Quantitative evaluations of the real-world dataset for health and medical documents show that FKLSA gives a higher performance as compared to state-of-the-art topic models like Latent Dirichlet allocation and Latent semantic analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据