4.6 Article

AID Phosphorylation Regulates Mismatch Repair-Dependent Class Switch Recombination and Affinity Maturation

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 204, 期 1, 页码 13-22

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900809

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Association of Immunologists Careers in Immunology Fellowship
  2. Professional Staff Congress at The City University of New York Enhanced Research Award
  3. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [5G12MD007603]
  4. National Cancer Institute [2U54CA132378]
  5. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [1SC1GM132035-01]
  6. American Association of Immunologists Early Career Faculty Travel Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) generates U:G mismatches in Ig genes that can be converted into untemplated mutations during somatic hypermutation or DNA double-strand breaks during class switch recombination (CSR). Null mutations in UNG and MSH2 demonstrate the complementary roles of the base excision repair (BER) and mismatch repair pathways, respectively, in CSR. Phosphorylation of AID at serine 38 was previously hypothesized to regulate BER during CSR, as the AID phosphorylation mutant, AID(S38A), cannot interact with APE1, a BER protein. Consistent with these findings, we observe a complete block in CSR in AID(S38A/S38A) MSH2(-/-) mouse B cells that correlates with an impaired mutation frequency at 5'S mu. Similarly, somatic hypermutation is almost negligible at the JH4 intron in AID(S38A/S38A) MSH2(-/-) mouse B cells, and, consistent with this, NP-specific affinity maturation in AID(S38A/S38A) MSH2(-/-) mice is not significantly elevated in response to NP-CGG immunization. Surprisingly, AID(S38A/S38A) UNG(-/-) mouse B cells also cannot complete CSR or affinity maturation despite accumulating significant mutations in 5'S mu as well as the JH4 intron. These data identify a novel role for phosphorylation of AID at serine 38 in mismatch repair-dependent CSR and affinity maturation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据