4.4 Review

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based analytical strategies for fatty acid analysis in biological samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD AND DRUG ANALYSIS
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 60-73

出版社

FOOD & DRUG ADMINSTRATION
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2019.10.003

关键词

Biological samples; Fatty acid; Gas chromatography; Mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 107-2113-M-002 -016 -MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatty acids play critical roles in biological systems. Imbalances in fatty acids are related to a variety of diseases, which makes the measurement of fatty acids in biological samples important. Many analytical strategies have been developed to investigate fatty acids in various biological samples. Due to the structural diversity of fatty acids, many factors need to be considered when developing analytical methods including extraction methods, derivatization methods, column selections, and internal standard selections. This review focused on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based methods. We reviewed several commonly used fatty acid extraction approaches, including liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction. Moreover, both acid and base derivatization methods and other specially designed methods were comprehensively reviewed, and their strengths and limitations were discussed. Having good separation efficiency is essential to building an accurate and reliable GC-MS platform for fatty acid analysis. We reviewed the separation performance of different columns and discussed the application of multidimensional GC for improving separations. The selection of internal standards was also discussed. In the final section, we introduced several biomedical studies that measured fatty acid levels in different sample matrices and provided hints on the relationships between fatty acid imbalances and diseases. Copyright (C) 2019, Food and Drug Administration, Taiwan. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据