4.5 Article

Extension of the δ-Plus-SPH model for simulating Vortex-Induced-Vibration problems

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 19-42

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.06.004

关键词

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics; delta-Plus-SPH model; Fluid -solid interaction; Vortex induced vibration; Tensile instability

资金

  1. National Project of Numerical Wind Tunnel of China [2018-ZT2B05]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872158]
  3. Ecole Centrale Nantes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the Lagrangian particle method delta-Plus-SPH model is used to solve a series of benchmark test-cases of vortex induced vibrations (VIV). An Adaptive Particle Refinement (APR) technique is adopted to resolve correctly the boundary layer regions of the moving bodies, and to de-refine the particles that are transported far away. Furthermore, a switch correction on the pressure forces term is adopted in the momentum equation to completely remove the occurrence of the so-called Tensile Instability that leads to the development of numerical cavitation in negative pressure regions. Because of the Lagrangian nature of the method, difficulties arise when intense vortex wakes, typically developed in VIV problems, cross the outflow boundary. To this purpose, a damping zone is also implemented close to the outlet to improve the numerical stability of the scheme. The fluid structure coupling technique is based on ghost particles properly generated inside the solid bodies. The validation is performed against test-cases for which reference solutions are available in the literature. Within those test-cases challenging benchmarks involving small mass ratios, large-amplitude body motions and multi-body interactions have been selected. For all the benchmark test-cases the delta-Plus-PH results are in good agreement with the reference solutions, demonstrating the ability of this particle method in solving complex VIV problems. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据