4.4 Article

The future of fish-based ecological assessment of European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 354-366

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14176

关键词

eDNA; fish-based assessment methods; rivers; Water Framework Directive; WFD

资金

  1. Compagnie Nationale du Rhone (CNR)
  2. SPYGEN
  3. Association Beauval Nature
  4. ANR AquaDNA [ANR-13-ECOT-0002]
  5. EU COST Action DNAqua-Net project: Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment of aquatic ecosystems in Europe [CA15219]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-ECOT-0002] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most EU Water Framework Directive compliant fish-based assessment methods for European rivers are calculated from traditional electrofishing (TEF) samples, but the use of environmental (e)DNA metabarcoding techniques has shown potential for various ecological applications.
Most of the present EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) compliant fish-based assessment methods of European rivers are multi-metric indices computed from traditional electrofishing (TEF) samples, but this method has known shortcomings, especially in large rivers. The probability of detecting rare species remains limited, which can alter the sensitivity of the indices. In recent years, environmental (e)DNA metabarcoding techniques have progressed sufficiently to allow applications in various ecological domains as well as eDNA-based ecological assessment methods. A review of the 25 current WFD-compliant methods for river fish shows that 81% of the metrics used in these methods are expressed in richness or relative abundance and thus compatible with eDNA samples. However, more than half of the member states' methods include at least one metric related to age or size structure and would have to adapt their current fish index if reliant solely on eDNA-derived information. Most trait-based metrics expressed in richness are higher when computed from eDNA than when computed from TEF samples. Comparable values are obtained only when the TEF sampling effort increases. Depending on the species trait considered, most trait-based metrics expressed in relative abundance are significantly higher for eDNA than for TEF samples or vice versa due to over-estimation of sub-surface species or under-estimation of benthic and rare species by TEF sampling, respectively. An existing predictive fish index, adapted to make it compatible with eDNA data, delivers an ecological assessment comparable with the current approved method for 22 of the 25 sites tested. Its associated uncertainty is lower than that of current fish indices. Recommendations for the development of future fish eDNA-based indices and the associated eDNA water sampling strategy are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据