4.7 Article

Photosynthetic efficiency and mesophyll conductance are unaffected in Arabidopsis thaliana aquaporin knock-out lines

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 318-329

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz442

关键词

Aquaporin; CO2 assimilation; mesophyll conductance; photosynthetic efficiency; PIP

资金

  1. research project Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency (RIPE) - Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research
  3. Department for International Development [OPP1172157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improving photosynthetic efficiency is widely regarded as a major route to achieving much-needed yield gains in crop plants. In plants with C-3 photosynthesis, increasing the diffusion conductance for CO(2 )transfer from substomatal cavity to chloroplast stroma (g(m)) could help to improve the efficiencies of CO2 assimilation and photosynthetic water use in parallel. The diffusion pathway from substomatal cavity to chloroplast traverses cell wall, plasma membrane, cytosol, chloroplast envelope membranes, and chloroplast stroma. Specific membrane intrinsic proteins of the aquaporin family can facilitate CO(2 )diffusion across membranes. Some of these aquaporins, such as PIP1;2 in Arabidopsis thaliana, have been suggested to exert control over g(m) and the magnitude of the CO2 assimilation flux, but the evidence for a direct physiological role of aquaporins in determining g(m) is limited. Here, we estimated g(m) with four different methods under a range of light intensities and CO(2 )concentrations in two previously characterized pip1;2 knock-out lines as well as pip1;3 and pip2;6 knock-out lines, which have not been previously evaluated for a role in g(m). This study presents the most in-depth analysis of g(m) in Arabidopsis aquaporin knock-out mutants to date. Surprisingly, all methods failed to show any significant differences between the pip1;2, pip1;3, or pip2;6 mutants and the Col-0 control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据