4.2 Article

Brain size affects responsiveness in mating behaviour to variation in predation pressure and sex ratio

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13556

关键词

decision-making; guppies; OSR; Poecilia reticulata; sexual behaviour; sexual selection; skill

资金

  1. Vetenskapsradet [2012-03624, 2016-03435]
  2. Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse [102 2013.0072]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2012-03624, 2016-03435] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite ongoing advances in sexual selection theory, the evolution of mating decisions remains enigmatic. Cognitive processes often require simultaneous processing of multiple sources of information from environmental and social cues. However, little experimental data exist on how cognitive ability affects such fitness-associated aspects of behaviour. Using advanced tracking techniques, we studied mating behaviours of guppies artificially selected for divergence in relative brain size, with known differences in cognitive ability, when predation threat and sex ratio was varied. In females, we found a general increase in copulation behaviour in when the sex ratio was female biased, but only large-brained females responded with greater willingness to copulate under a low predation threat. In males, we found that small-brained individuals courted more intensively and displayed more aggressive behaviours than large-brained individuals. However, there were no differences in female response to males with different brain size. These results provide further evidence of a role for female brain size in optimal decision-making in a mating context. In addition, our results indicate that brain size may affect mating display skill in male guppies. We suggest that it is important to consider the association between brain size, cognitive ability and sexual behaviour when studying how morphological and behavioural traits evolve in wild populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据