4.2 Article

Microbial toxicity of gallium- and indium-based oxide and arsenide nanoparticles

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2019.1676065

关键词

inhibition; arsenic; particle size; dissolution; methanogenesis; Microtox

资金

  1. Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) Engineering Research Center for Environmental Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing [425.052]
  2. National Science Foundation under NSF-CBET/GOALI Award [1507446]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1507446] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

III-V semiconductor materials such as gallium arsenide (GaAs) and indium arsenide (InAs) are increasingly used in the fabrication of electronic devices. There is a growing concern about the potential release of these materials into the environment leading to effects on public and environmental health. The waste effluents from the chemical mechanical planarization process could impact microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment systems. Currently, there is only limited information about the inhibition of gallium- and indium-based nanoparticles (NPs) on microorganisms. This study evaluated the acute toxicity of GaAs, InAs, gallium oxide (Ga2O3), and indium oxide (In2O3) particulates using two microbial inhibition assays targeting methanogenic archaea and the marine bacterium, Aliivibrio fischeri. GaAs and InAs NPs were acutely toxic towards these microorganisms; Ga2O3 and In2O3 NPs were not. The toxic effect was mainly due to the release of soluble arsenic species and it increased with decreasing particle size and with increasing time due to the progressive corrosion of the NPs in the aqueous bioassay medium. Collectively, the results indicate that the toxicity exerted by the arsenide NPs under environmental conditions will vary depending on intrinsic properties of the material such as particle size as well as on the dissolution time and aqueous chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据