4.7 Article

Heavy metals risk assessment in drinking water: An integrated probabilistic-fuzzy approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109514

关键词

Water quality; Heavy metals; Arsenic; Probabilistic health risk assessment; Fuzzy inference system; Uncertainty

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Strategic Partnership Grants for Projects (NSERC SPG-P)
  2. RES'EAU-WaterNET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heavy metal(loids) in drinking water have long been a critical water quality concern. Chronic exposure to toxic heavy metals and metalloids (TMMs) through water ingestion can result in significant health risks to the public, while elevated concentrations of less toxic heavy metals (LTMs) can compromise the aesthetic value of water. An integrated probabilistic-fuzzy approach was developed to help water utilities assess water quality regarding heavy metal(loids) (WQHM). In probabilistic assessments, the probabilities of exceedance of health risk guidelines due to chronic exposure to TMMs and exceedance of aesthetic objectives due to elevated LTMs concentrations were quantified through Monte Carlo simulations. The probabilistic assessments can address the aleatory uncertainties due to random variations of health risk parameters. A fuzzy inference system, composed of fuzzy membership functions, operators, and rules, was used to facilitate interpreting WQHM based on the probabilities of guideline exceedance. Epistemic uncertainties due to vagueness and imprecision in linguistic variables used for describing health risks and aesthetic impacts can be reduced by fuzzy inferencing. The developed approach was applied to four water quality scenarios characterized by different combinations of TMMs and LTMs concentrations. Reasonable decisions were recommended for WQHM management under the four scenarios. The developed approach offers a useful tool for systematically assessing WQHM from a health risk mitigation perspective by addressing different types of uncertainties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据