4.1 Article

Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1556264619888365

关键词

trust; big data; biorepositories; biobanks; cohort study; decision making; qualitative methods; the Netherlands; justice; participant selection; inclusion; recruitment

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research from the program Responsible Innovation [313-99-313]
  2. Dutch Government
  3. Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research [175.010.2007.006]
  4. Northern Netherlands Collaboration of Provinces (SNN)
  5. European fund for regional development
  6. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  7. Pieken in de Delta
  8. Province of Groningen
  9. Province of Drenthe
  10. Target project
  11. BBMRI-NL
  12. University of Groningen
  13. University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exponential increases in digital data and calls for participation in human research raise questions about when and why individuals voluntarily provide personal data. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and nonparticipants in a biobank to identify key factors influencing trust in centralized large-scale data repository for human research. Our findings indicated that trust depends strongly on whether such data repository benefits the public, the interests of data collectors, the characteristics of the collected data, and application of informed consent for retaining control over personal data. Concerns about the aims and range of data repository appeared to influence withdrawal of participation. Our findings underscore ethical and practical issues relating to data collection and consent procedures in human research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据