4.7 Article

An expeditious four-component domino protocol for the synthesis of novel thiazolo[3,2-a] thiochromeno[4,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as antibacterial and antibiofilm agents

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 16, 页码 3808-3817

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.06.025

关键词

Ionic liquid; Thiazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidines; Efficient protocol; Multicomponent reactions; Antibacterial; Anti-biofilm

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development
  2. CSIR, New Delhi [09/922 (0005) 2012/EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient domino protocol has been developed for the synthesis of new pyrimidine scaffolds, through a one-pot four-component cascade transformation via [Bmim] HSO4 ionic liquid mediated reaction, using an equimolar mixture of thiochroman-4-one, benzaldehyde, thiourea and 3-bromo-1-phenylpropan-1-one leading to the formation of a double electrophilic pyrimidine-2(5H)-thione intermediate. The intermediate regioselectively undergoes cyclization through intramolecular N-H bond activation followed by C-S bond formation leading to highly functionalized thiazolo[3,2-a]thiochromeno[4,3-d]pyrimidines. The ionic liquid operates efficiently under mild conditions. The recyclability and scope for recovery of the ionic liquid makes this protocol environmentally benign. Further, the compounds 5d, 5g and 5k showed promising antimicrobial activity against the tested Gram-positive bacterial strains. Among them, the compound 5d was identified as a lead molecule exhibiting promising anti-biofilm activity towards Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 96, Bacillus subtilis MTCC 121, Staphylococcus aureus MLS16 MTCC 2940 and Micrococcus luteus MTCC 2470 with IC50 values of 2.1, 1.9, 2.4 and 5.3 mu g/mL, respectively. Further, the compound 5d showed increased levels of intracellular ROS accumulation in Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 96 suggesting that oxidative stress resulted in bacterial cell lysis and death. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据