4.3 Article

HIGH-DOSE INSULIN FOR TOXIN INDUCED CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: EXPERIENCE AT A NEW HIGH AND OVERVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE

期刊

JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 317-323

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.10.018

关键词

adrenergic beta-antagonists; calcium channel blockers; drug overdose; insulin; shock; cardiogenic shock

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: High-dose insulin therapy is an effective treatment for cardiogenic shock caused by the overdose of particular medications. Other treatment options are usually of limited benefit. Consensus suggests that early initiation improves efficacy. No ceiling effect has been established at doses in the general range of 0.5-10 units/kg/hour. Case Report: A 79-year-old man presented in cardiogenic shock after an intentional overdose of numerous cardioactive medications 10 days after experiencing myocardial infarction. A high-dose insulin infusion was commenced. This was titrated up to a maximum of 20 units/kg/hour 1600 units/hour) and sustained for 32 h (61,334 units total). Minimal adverse events were seen despite this exceptional infusion rate (3 episodes of hypoglycemia and 2 episodes of hypokalemia). Concurrent catecholamine support was used, and cardiovascular function was maintained until all support was withdrawn 5 days after admission. Why Should an Emergency Physician be Aware of This?: Emergency physicians are pivotal to the successful initiation/uptitration of high-dose insulin therapy. They must balance the potential for treatment failure with other treatment options, mitigate against adverse events in the initial phase of therapy, and coordinate care between other hospital specialties. This case shows that the relative safety and efficacy was extended to an infusion rate of 20 units/kg/hour, the highest recorded in the published literature. This information may help guide treatment of similar cases in the future. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据