4.7 Article

Protein fingerprinting and quantification of β-casein variants by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 103, 期 2, 页码 1193-1207

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16273

关键词

A2 beta-casein; milk protein; proteoform; genetic variant; high-resolution mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infant formulations arc constantly evolving as novel protein ingredients are added to make them more closely mimic the protein profile of human milk; however, precise analytical methods for characterizing and quantifying the major milk proteins in such formulations are currently lacking. This article describes an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry method for intact proteins that can efficiently detect, identify, and characterize the major milk proteins and their proteoforms (phosphorylation status, degree of glycation, genetic variants among others) in ingredients and final products, with an emphasis on detecting and quantifying specific genetic variants of beta-casein in infant formulas. Method sensitivity allows detection of beta-casein A1 in A2-based infant formulas with a limit of detection of 2% (grams of beta-casein A1 per 100 g of total beta-casein). Protein glycation affects signal intensity in a linear fashion, which permits proteins to be quantified from their mass spectrometry signals after correction according to their measured glycation index. The method was validated for the quantification of beta-casein in infant formulas. Repeatability ranged from 2 to 3% and intermediate reproducibility from 5 to 9%. Calculated beta-casein amounts ranged between 77 and 110% of the values based on formulations and published protein profiles for milk. Altogether, this method can be used for general fingerprinting as well as specific characterization and quantification of individual major milk proteins in dairy-based ingredients and products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据